Connect with us


A new national CSPI survey indicates an extremely favorable public response to the relabeling.




The push for mandatory front-of-pack nutrition labeling continues to grow as new organizations join the effort encourage the Food and Drug Administration to develop labels that draw attention to the high levels of added sugars, sodium and saturated fat in packaged, processed foods. And a new poll commissioned by the CSPI finds strong public support for the proposal.

The American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, the American Heart Association, the American Public Health Association, the Consumer Federation of America, and Consumer Reports are among 17 organizations that filed supportive comment with the FDA, which opened the regulatory list in response to August 2022 Petition submitted by the Center for Science in the Public Interest, the State SNAP Association of Nutrition Education Administrators, and the State Association of Public Health Dietitians.

“We are dismayed that the United States has become one of the countries with the greatest need for such public health interventions but with the least action,” the 17 organizations wrote. “The time has come for the FDA to take bold action to improve our nation’s nutrition and health. Please prioritize this evidence-based policy and develop a mandatory front-of-pack labeling system for the United States.”

The comment notes that the average American adult consumes 50 percent more sodium, 40 percent more added sugars, and 40 percent more saturated fat daily than recommended. Meanwhile, approximately 122 million American adults have hypertension, more than 30 million Americans have type 2 diabetes, and 20 million American adults have coronary heart disease. Each of these conditions is strongly associated with excess consumption of added sugar, salt, or saturated fat, depending on the groups.

The idea of ​​front-of-pack labeling received a significant boost late last year when the Biden administration approved it as part of its National Hunger, Nutrition and Health Strategy. FDA ready to start quantitative research testing consumer response to various potential front-of-pack labeling systems.

FDA dock received over 7,700 public comments, over 5,500 of which have been published to date. The vast majority of posted comments support the petition. These supportive comments include contributions from scientists at the Harvard School of Public Health. T. H. Chan, the University of Pennsylvania and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.

Separately in the new a comment filed with the registry on Thursday, CSPI noted that of all the comments in the public registry, only one opposes mandatory labeling on the front of the package – joint comment The Consumer Brand Associations (a trade association formerly known as the Grocery Manufacturers Association) and the FMI Food Industries Association. This comment argues, among other things, that the FDA may not have the authority to issue front-of-package labels.

But CSPI comment in reply explains how Congress gave the FDA broad authority over food labeling in general when it passed the Food Labeling and Education Act, a law that the FDA used to create mandatory nutrition fact labels. The intent of Congress was made clear in the language of the report accompanying this legislation, when it wrote: “In order to present nutritional information in a way that is easier for the public to understand, the secretary may choose from a variety of options. … This may include the use of descriptive terms such as “high”, “medium” and “low”, or the use of generic symbols to indicate desired or undesirable levels of certain nutrients.” Therefore, the FDA has the right to require clarification of nutritional information on the front of the package in accordance with the NLEA. Last month CSPI commissioned national survey to assess public support for a mandatory front-of-pack food labeling policy in the United States. The poll found high levels of support among demographics, with 75 percent of all consumers supporting politics, including among Democrats (83 percent), Republicans (68 percent) and independents (73 percent).

“It’s worth remembering that the food industry was vehemently opposed to Nutrition Facts labels when they were first introduced, variously claiming they would violate the First Amendment, confuse consumers, and be too expensive for the industry,” said CSPI President Dr. Peter G Lurie. “Industry’s arguments against nutritional labeling on packaged foods sound as unconvincing today as they did 35 years ago.”

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety Newsletter, click Here)


Berlusconi family moved from intensive care unit to regular ward



Italian media reports that former Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi has been transferred from the intensive care unit to a regular ward in a Milan hospital.

ROME– Former Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, who is suffering from chronic leukemia, has been transferred from the intensive care unit to a regular ward in a Milan hospital where he is being treated for a lung infection, his brother said on Sunday.

“It’s all right, he’s out of intensive care,” Paolo Berlusconi was quoted as saying by the Milanese daily Corriere della Sera before visiting his 86-year-old brother and sister in the San Raffaele hospital.

The Italian news agency LaPresse also reported that the brother confirmed the transfer from the intensive care unit to the hospital where he was admitted on April 5.

The hospital declined to comment on the report but said it would release a medical bulletin on Berlusconi’s condition on Monday.

Matteo Salvini, a longtime right-wing ally of Berlusconi and currently a government minister, tweeted “Good luck Silvio my friend” and linked his wishes in a tweet to the Corriere report.

Berlusconi was hospitalized for what his doctors called a lung infection. During his hospitalization, his doctors, including his longtime personal physician, publicly announced that the former three-time prime minister had chronic leukemia.

Berlusconi has also had severe heart problems in years past and was admitted to the same hospital in critical condition in 2020 to be treated for COVID-19.

His Forza Italia party, which he founded some 30 years ago, and Salvini’s Antimigrant League are junior partners in a government led by far-right Prime Minister Georgia Meloni. Unlike Salvini, who is the minister of infrastructure and transport, Berlusconi does not hold a government post.

Continue Reading


‘Buckling’ NHS fails to treat 250,000 children with mental health problems | mental health



A quarter of a million children in the UK with mental health problems have been left without help from the NHS as it struggles to cope with a growing caseload amid a children’s mental health crisis.

Some NHS funds fail to offer treatment for 60% of patients referred by GPs, a study based on responses to freedom of information requests found.

V study by House magazine and shared with the Guardian, also revealed a zip code lottery: Costs per child are four times higher in some parts of the country than others, while the average waiting time for a first appointment varies by trust from 10 days to three years.

In 2021-2022, the trusts were forced to raise the threshold at which they could offer support to address backlogs, resulting in hundreds of thousands of children being rejected or denied treatment after a long wait.

The total represents 32% of all referrals compared to the previous year’s quarter, according to FoI requests sent to 70 UK Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) trusts and councils.

Previous research has shown that many of the 54 NHS Mental Health Trusts in England have raised the threshold for how sick children under 18 must be before they receive treatment, in response to the massive and persistent increase in demand for care that Covid has exacerbated. .

This prompted complaints from affected young people, their families and general practitioners who cited Camhs that even those under 18 who are seriously ill and self-harm or contemplate suicide are denied care because they are considered not sick enough. Mental health services are also struggling with a severe shortage of psychiatrists and specialized nurses.

Former Children’s Commissioner Ann Longfield said the long wait resulted in only the worst crises being prioritized. She heard repeated stories of children who tried to commit suicide but were not offered support because they had not reached the threshold of multiple attempts. “The first thing to judge is whether they really meant it,” she said, adding: “The threshold is so high because the system is failing. He fought before Covid, but the pandemic added rocket fuel to him.”

Ollie Parker, head of external affairs at YoungMinds, said the FoI findings showed “the system is completely shut down” with no “clear government plan to rescue it” after the 10-year mental health plan was cancelled.

“At the same time, young people are harming themselves and trying to commit suicide, waiting months and even years for help after being referred by doctors,” he said. “It’s not the kids who say, ‘I’m unhappy.’ They are sick, they are desperate and they need urgent help.”

Average waiting lists have risen by two-thirds in two years in England, meaning children wait an average of 21 weeks for their first appointment in England, although that figure has dropped to three weeks in Wales. Only 12% of trusts that responded to the request for information met the government’s four-week target for first appointments.

Nearly three-quarters of the English trusts surveyed said they had at least one youth waiting for at least a year, and two-fifths had someone waiting for at least two years. The longest wait was 217 weeks, with the longest wait across all trusts currently averaging 87 weeks across the UK.

It was the Roanne Brewer experience. She has two children, aged 15 and 11, who have been diagnosed with ADHD and autism, as well as other mental health issues, including self-harm. She has spent over four years on the CAMHS waiting list for her son, who is still waiting for an official ADHD assessment, while her daughter has only been offered online group therapy, which is not a good fit for her.

“No parent wants to do what I did, which is lie on the floor in my child’s bedroom every night because they are so scared and so worried. They are quite traumatized,” she said.

She had to withdraw her children from school due to lack of support and despite her low income she spent thousands of pounds on private doctors who prescribed SSRIs for her children.

skip previous promotional email

She believes CAMHS lumps all of her daughter’s mental health issues under the umbrella of autism, making it hard to get targeted support despite promises before the pandemic of a new funded neurodiversity pathway at the foundation that will accelerate progress in anticipation. list. “We haven’t seen anyone yet,” she said.

The numbers are repeated in recent report from the Commissioner for Children in England, who warned that too many children were in critical condition and hospitalized, which could have been prevented by earlier intervention.

Dame Rachel de Souza, Commissioner for Children, said children’s mental health is a “key pillar” of her work. “I am especially concerned about this surge in demand for help in my recent research. We are seeing waiting times increase for the first time in years, and the number of zip codes for children referred for treatment is increasing.”

She urged the government to roll out mental health support teams in every school by the end of 2025 and any investment in mental health must be directed towards children. “It is very important that this support is available – without it, too many children could be in crisis.”

Responding to the FoI findings, a spokesman for the Department of Health and Human Services said: “We are determined to do everything we can to support the mental health of children and young people, regardless of their background or location.

“School support is vital, which is why by April 2023 we are increasing the number of school mental health teams to almost 400, supporting 3 million children and youth.

“We are also working closely with NHS England to introduce new standards for access and waiting times for mental health services, ensuring faster access to high quality care across the country.”

Continue Reading


What is bone grafting? – Learn different types of vaccination procedures



Surgical treatment of bone grafting has recently gained popularity, especially in the field of dentistry. It is a complex but incredibly successful method of growing new, healthy bone to replace lost or damaged bone. When performed to restore bone loss caused by injury, disease, or other medical conditions, bone grafting can help many patients regain function and improve their quality of life.

During this process, the bone is removed from another location in the patient’s or donor’s body and transplanted to the problem site. The newly implanted bone then contributes to the development of new bone tissue, which eventually fuses with the original bone. To create a solid base for implant attachment, bone grafting is often used in dental implant treatment. This can be done on many areas of the body, including the spine, hips, and jaws. It is recommended to speak with a qualified medical expert if you are interested To learn more about bone grafting and how it can help you.


Bone grafting techniques, known as “autografts,” use the patient’s own bone to replace or repair damaged bone. This approach is often chosen because it does not carry the risk of disease transmission or tissue rejection associated with the use of foreign tissue. Autografts can be taken from the thigh, leg, or chest, among other parts of the body. The damaged area is then treated with bone tissue, which over time will grow together and develop there.


Allografts involve the transplantation of bone tissue from a donor, which can be either a living or deceased person. Donor bone is carefully cleaned and sterilized before transplantation to ensure that there are no infections or diseases. Allografts are an effective and safe option for bone grafting, as they do not require the removal of bone tissue from the patient’s body.

Alloplastic grafts

Alloplastic bone grafting procedures are a type of bone grafting that uses synthetic materials. Alloplastic grafts are typically used to fill small gaps in bones or to provide structural support. The materials used for alloplastic grafts can vary, but are most commonly ceramics, metals, and polymers. This type of bone grafting procedure is often preferred over other types of grafting procedures because it does not require a donor site and is less likely to result in complications such as infection or rejection.


Xenografts are a type of bone grafting procedure that uses bone material from a different species, usually bovine or porcine, to replace missing or damaged bone in a human patient. This material is processed to remove any living cells that might elicit an immune response, leaving behind only the bone matrix. Xenografts have a number of advantages including availability, affordability, and ease of use. They also carry a small risk of disease transmission and may not be as effective as other types of bone grafts in certain situations.

synthetic transplants

These procedures involve the use of artificial materials such as ceramics or polymers to stimulate bone growth and regeneration. Synthetic grafts can be tailored to a patient’s specific needs, making them an ideal choice for a variety of bone-related injuries and conditions. Synthetic grafts are often less expensive and less invasive than traditional bone grafting procedures, reducing recovery time and patient discomfort.

Continue Reading