Connect with us


I have panic attacks during sex – and it torments my husband | Life and style



My husband and I in our 30 years old, together nine years, no children. A couple of years ago I had severe anxiety and depression, which I keep fighting. As a result, I always had problems with sex, I never felt this sex, and although I love my husband very much, he is very kind, caring. and a patient man – I know that sex important to him. I enjoy closeness like kisses and hugs, but we I didn’t have sex over seven months, and the last time we tried, I had a panic attack. We talked to each other on how to get through this and what could be the problem but have no idea how to proceed. At the age of 33 and 34 we face the prospect of (I believe) sexless marriage. i know deep down this is torture for him and I would rather let him go than let him spend the rest of his life in an asexual relationship.

Anxiety and depression can significantly reduce sex drive, and some medications used to treat them can negatively affect various aspects of sexual response. It is extremely important that you talk about your sexual problems to the person who treats your mood disorder. Don’t underestimate the severity of a panic attack while trying to have sex. You deserve treatment that will help you become very mentally and sexually healthy, so strongly advocate for your own healing. Many people find it difficult to discuss sex with their doctors and think they have no right to ask about possible genital side effects from their medications. Don’t be one of them.

  • If you would like Pamela’s sexual advice, please send us a summary of your concerns at (please do not send attachments). Each week, Pamela chooses one problem to solve, which will be published on the Internet. She regrets that she cannot enter personal correspondence. Content is subject to our terms and conditions.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Benefits of partnering with a lead generation agency and how to choose the right one




Lead generation is an important aspect of marketing that involves identifying and developing potential customers. A lead generation agency is a specialized firm that helps companies generate new leads and target them through various marketing channels.

These agencies use several techniques such as search engine optimization, email campaigns, social media outreach, content marketing, and other digital strategies to generate qualified leads that can turn into paying customers. Thanks to their knowledge and experience, lead generation agency can create effective campaigns that drive more quality leads into the business’s sales funnel, resulting in increased revenue and customer loyalty.

Benefits of working with a lead generation agency

Partnering with a lead generation agency offers many benefits for companies of all sizes. These benefits include greater dissemination and visibility, access to expertise and resources, and cost savings and efficiency gains.

Increased exposure and visibility

One of the main benefits of partnering with a lead generation company is increased exposure. Lead generation agencies have extensive networks spanning multiple industries and access to databases containing valuable lead information. This data allows them to create targeted campaigns that reach their target audience in the most efficient way. Plus, they have dedicated tools to help them track response rates so they can adjust their campaigns accordingly for maximum success. This type of insight is invaluable when it comes to building awareness for your business or brand.

Access to experience and resources

Lead generation agencies also provide access to expert professionals who have extensive knowledge of generating leads through various channels such as email campaigns, social media, search engine optimization (SEO), etc. These experienced professionals know how to position a product or service to attract potential customers interested in what the business has to offer. In addition, these agencies typically provide additional resources such as marketing automation software, lead scoring tools, and analytics dashboards that help companies improve their lead generation efforts.

Savings and efficiency

Partnering with a lead generation agency can also help companies cut costs and improve process efficiency. By outsourcing lead generation efforts to an experienced agency, businesses can avoid the costs associated with hiring and training new employees, acquiring marketing tools and software, and managing campaigns in-house. Lead generation agencies also have the experience and resources to manage campaigns more effectively, resulting in a higher return on investment (ROI) for the business.

Features of a good lead generation agency

When choosing a lead generation agency, you should pay attention to several key characteristics. These include a comprehensive service package, experienced team members and a proven track record of successful campaigns.

Comprehensive service package

A good lead generation agency will have a comprehensive package of services that covers all aspects of lead generation from strategy development and campaign planning to implementation and results analysis. This type of package ensures that all aspects of a campaign are managed with meticulous attention to every detail so that businesses get the highest possible return on investment (ROI).

Experienced team members

Experienced team members are critical to successful lead generation campaigns. When choosing a lead generation agency, companies should choose a team with proven experience and technical expertise. These team members must also have the creative vision to develop effective campaigns that are specifically tailored to the needs of the business. They need to understand how technology works together with marketing methods so they can deliver maximum campaign reach to target customers.

Proven track record of successful campaigns

An experienced team member is only as good as their performance, so it’s also important to consider their track record in terms of successful past campaigns when choosing an agency. This includes analyzing case studies, testimonials and reviews from other clients in similar industries or markets.

How to choose the right lead generation agency for your business

Choosing the right lead generation agency for your business can be a daunting task. However, reviewing goals and objectives, researching potential agencies, and evaluating cost versus value proposition can help you along the way. It’s also worth noting that when evaluating cost versus value proposition, it’s important to keep in mind that a cheaper agency may not necessarily provide the same level of expertise or deliver the same quality of results as a more expensive agency. Therefore, it is important to consider the long-term benefits of working with a more experienced and successful agency that can provide a higher return on investment.

property values. Manager with a calculator. Real estate investment.

In conclusion, partnering with a lead generation agency is a great way to grow your business’s customer base and increase sales. With their specialized services, businesses can target specific consumer groups, develop strategies for successful lead conversion, and track results. By choosing the right lead generation agency, companies can quickly expand their footprint and accelerate their growth. However, it’s important to keep your goals and objectives in mind, research potential agencies, and evaluate their value against the value proposition before making a decision.

Continue Reading


Jones Act is unconstitutional



The Merchant Marine Act of 1920 is special interest politics at its worst—a destructive law that Congress seems powerless to repeal. A protectionist law, commonly known as the Jones Act, prohibits foreign ships from carrying goods between US ports. As a consequence, inland waterway travel is limited to American ships, which are more expensive to operate and tend to be significantly older and less safe than their foreign counterparts. Research estimates that the Jones Act costs the US economy more than a billion dollars a year, with non-contiguous areas such as Alaska, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico bearing the brunt of its effects. Despite the cost of the law, powerful shipping and shipbuilding companies have successfully lobbied to keep it afloat.

But there may be a solution in one of the most neglected provisions of the Constitution: the port preference clause.

Continue Reading


A federal court denied two of Michael Parnell’s motions.



In 2014, Federal Judge W. Louis Sands, with senior status, presided over the criminal trial of U.S. executives of the Peanut Corporation. And in the new rulings, Sands once again said “no” and “no” to the defendant Michael Parnell, who sought both a “compassionate release” and an overturning of his conviction on constitutional grounds.

It spells defeat for Parnell, 64, who was a peanut broker for the PCA, when his peanut processing plant in Blakely, Georgia, was discovered to be the source of a deadly salmonella outbreak in several states. He is currently in Fort Dix, New Jersey federal prison, serving a 20-year sentence.

In the motion, originally filed in February 2021, Parnell asked “the court to reduce and suspend his remaining term of incarceration so that he can be placed under electronic home surveillance at his Virginia residence for as long as the court deems reasonable and then placed in custody.” . supervised probation.”

On February 15, 2013, Parnell was charged with alleged conspiracy to commit mail fraud and wire fraud, conspiracy to introduce adulterated food into interstate commerce, conspiracy to introduce adulterated food into interstate commerce, introducing adulterated and misbranded foodstuffs into interstate commerce with intent to deceive or mislead, interstate delivery fraud, electronic fraud, and obstruction of justice.

In September 2014, after a seven-week jury trial, Parnell was found guilty of conspiracy to commit mail fraud and wire fraud, conspiracy to introduce adulterated and substandard food into interstate commerce with intent to deceive or mislead misleading, and multiple counts of mislabeling food products in interstate commerce, multiple mail fraud, and multiple electronic communications fraud.

He was acquitted of all charges of introducing adulterated food into the interstate commerce. He was sentenced to 240 months in prison, followed by a supervised release for three years. The verdict was upheld on appeal by the 11th Federal District Court of Atlanta.

While applying for a compassionate release in 2021, Parnell said there were “extraordinary and compelling reasons” including the fact that he is 61 years old, overweight and suffers from chronic debilitating conditions including type 2 diabetes. and hypertension.

He also argued that “FCI Fort Dix, the federal correctional facility where the defendant is currently located, contracted COVID-19 and the security plan provided by the Bureau of Prisons is ‘virtually impossible’ to comply with due to narrow corridors that make social distancing impossible.” and poor indoor air circulation.

Sands obtained Parnell’s medical records through the U.S. Probation Service and, upon review, found “no extraordinary or compelling reason that would warrant a compassionate release.” He said Parnell “points to medical causes such as clinical overweight, type II diabetes and hypertension. But, according to the main policy statement, the only medical conditions that rise to the level of extraordinary and compelling reasons are those that (i) are terminal illnesses or (ii) “substantially impair the defendant’s ability to provide self-care” within prison.

Sands said he “agrees with the government that simply pointing out the existence of his medical condition is not sufficient” as Parnell “has not demonstrated that his condition is not being properly treated or managed, or that his ability to care for himself in prison is significant.” limited.” reduced as a result of his medical conditions.”

The US Probation Department stated that Parnell was “prescribed various medications for hypertension, diabetes, and liver disease.” He also received Covid 19 vaccines.

“After a thorough and complete examination of the record, the motion and response, the applicable factors pursuant to § 3553(a), and the relevant policy statements of the Sentencing Commission, the defendant’s motion for compassionate release REJECTEDSands decided.

Following the hearing, U.S. Justice of the Peace Thomas K. Langstaff had previously found that Parnell had failed to establish evidence that his trial attorney provided ineffective assistance and therefore recommended against 2255 Moton that the conviction and conviction be overturned.

Langstaff’s report was submitted to Sands for either acceptance or rejection, and he fully supports the magistrate’s findings and the denial of Parnell’s motion.

Parnell and his brother Stuart Parnell, former president of the Peanut Corporation of America (PCA). were among those who pointed out the salmonellosis outbreak in 2008-09.

Michael Parnell managed PCA’s sales of peanut butter to Kellogg. Prior to its closure in 2009, PCA manufactured and sold peanut products to food manufacturers in the United States.

Federal authorities have identified a PCA manufacturing plant in Blakely, Georgia as the source of a nationwide salmonellosis outbreak. After a four-year investigation, the Parnell brothers were charged with their food safety behavior at the PCA.

This is how Sands recalls what happened:

“In court, the government presented evidence that plaintiff Michael Parnell, his brother, and co-defendant Stewart colluded with PCA senior management to defraud its customers about the safety of its products.

“At the direction of Stuart Parnell, the PCA retested a product that tested positive for Salmonella until it tested negative, or shipped a product before it received test results for that product, and even shipped a product after it tested positive. The government also presented evidence of a scheme designed by Stewart, Michael and other top management to help the PCA meet manufacturing needs on Kellogg’s behalf. In September 2007

“PCA has begun assigning future batch numbers to peanut butter samples submitted for testing. They used those test results to create certificates of analysis for new batches of peanut butter she sent to Kellogg’s. The Certificate of Analysis for Kellogg orders contained test results from a sample taken from a previous batch. The shipped batch has not been tested. The PCA took samples from the new batch, assigned future batch numbers to those samples, and sent them out for testing to keep the practice going. The PCA did not tell Kellogg’s if a batch that had already been shipped tested positive.

Between January 2008 and January 2009, more than 60 percent of Kellogg’s pasta shipments were not subjected to any microbiological testing. Plaintiff Michael Parnell, along with other defendants, knew that the PCA had tested positive for salmonellosis prior to the Salmonella outbreak. But they were not provided by the FDA during the investigation.”

Michael Parnell filed Motion 2255 for release on March 5, 2019. It is sometimes referred to as the Habeus Corpus petition. Stuart Parnell’s Petition 2255, also filed in 2019, was also denied by Sands and is currently on appeal in the 11th Circuit in federal court.

Michael Parnell argued, “His attorney, Mr. Ed Tolley, provided ineffective assistance by (1) not proposing a change of venue, (2) not striking the jury in the case, who were aware of the allegations of death from a salmonella outbreak.” , (3) failure to investigate witnesses who were brought to the attention of counsel that could materially discredit key government witnesses, and (4) failure to investigate after it emerged that the jury was potentially influenced by out-of-court information.”

Sands considered these “objections groundless”.

Thousands fell ill with salmonella due to PCA peanut butter and peanut butter contamination in 2008–2009, and the outbreak killed nine people.

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety Newsletter, click Here)

Continue Reading