Meanwhile, Donald Trump happened. However, someone felt that the victory of candidates without a majority, the potential for ranked electoral voting to reduce extremism and encourage broad appeal suddenly made it more relevant. And Minnesota ran out of new cities to enroll. In 2020, Massey took to her council with an audacious plan to identify state legislators and candidates from any party who would take the lead vote and do whatever it took to win the upcoming election.
Maureen Reed, a retired physician who heads the board, understood the logic. “I wasn’t an emergency room doctor,” she told me over lunch at Rathskeller, the vaulted basement restaurant of Minnesota’s majestic State Capitol. “I worked in internal medicine and geriatrics. I tried to keep people healthy.” In search of root causes, Reed moved from medicine to public health and public policy. Her own work in health care convinced her that “the rhetoric of hyperpartisanship had led to a dead end.” The board approved Massey’s plan. The organization has received large gifts for its lobbying and educational program from local, regional and national foundations; by far the largest amount, $1,755,000 over three years plus $150,000 for More Voices Minnesota, PAC FairVote, came from John Arnold, a Houston-based hedge fund manager and philanthropist. Arnold is indeed out of state, but the funds have been made public. He doesn’t seem to have anything to do with George Soros.
The 2020 elections proved to be a warm-up in the age of Covid. In the 2022 election, FairVote gave $140,000 in political donations to Democratic candidates, a significant amount for races across the state, and also ran its spirited door-strike campaign. The ratings choice vote was hardly the main issue that year; issues of abortion and criminal justice have been much more important since the death of George Floyd. But the money and energy of FairVote helped turn the state Senate upside down and spawned a “trinity”—the Democratic House, the Senate, and the Governor. Many of these Democrats have reason to be grateful to FairVote. As I pursued Massey through the State Capitol, I asked why State Senator Heather Gustafson agreed to speak at a rally the next day. “She’s a big supporter,” Massey explained. “We targeted swing areas,” including her. (In fact, Gustafson did not show up for the rally.)
Trifecta made it possible to pass a law on ranked voting, but hardly. Though there are notably moderate Republicans in the state, including former US Senator Dave Durenberger and the ex-governor. Arne Carlson supported this idea. The Republican Party of Minnesota, like the party almost everywhere else, has become more conservative and more hardline. Today’s Republicans view nearly all seemingly neutral political reforms, whether they eliminate fraud, reduce the influence of money, or hold non-partisan primaries, as a conspiracy to elect Democrats. So it’s not surprising that no Republican legislator in the state has publicly endorsed the ratings vote.
When I asked Mark Koran, a Republican member of the House of Representatives and a leading critic, why he opposes the bill, he first told me about dark money out of state, although without repeating the Soros canard. Koran challenged the theses of the vote on the rating. “It is argued that we can create a softer electoral system,” he said. But after the killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis, he said, progressive candidates launched inflammatory campaigns. He added that Minnesota already had a high turnout and a wide variety of candidates. Why fix something that isn’t broken? If here What the problem, he said, was “transparency”. He claimed that outside dark money was used to defeat district attorneys willing to investigate election fraud. The Qur’an told me about the 2008 US Senate race in which Democrat Al Franken defeated Republican Norm Coleman on what he called “11,000 rigged votes,” including 340 unauthorized criminals. It was a real election problem – and no one looked at it.
Jean Massey lined up the star witness at the House Select Committee hearing is Mary Peltola, an Alaskan Democrat who defeated Palin in Congress last year. Peltola won only 10 percent of the vote in the state’s open primary, but that was enough to get her through to the general election, where she defeated Palin largely because 15,000 people who voted for more moderate Republican Nick Begich put Peltola on the ticket. not Palin as their second choice. At the same time, Senator Lisa Murkowski, who voted to impeach Trump for inciting riots in the Capitol on January 6, ended up in a virtual tie with Trumpist Kelly Chibaka and then retained her seat thanks to the votes she received after the removal of the Democrat. . Alaska provided a proof of concept—and lived up to the fears of the right.
The room where the committee met had tables, chairs, and microphones in the center, with seats raised up on either side. As if by some unspoken premise, blue shirts occupied one row of seats and orange shirts the other. Thus, the hearing bore an uncanny resemblance to a college football game, although the referees do not usually have to silence the fans as the presiding member did with the blues during the testimony of a ratings-voting opponent. The first to speak was Democratic Rep. Cedric Frazier, the bill’s sponsor in the House of Representatives. Frazier, who is black, argued that the rank-and-selection vote encourages ethnic and racial minorities, as well as other outsiders, to run for office as they can win in the later rounds.
Peltola then sat down next to him. A native of Yup’ik, Peltola has a warm smile and a noble air. She spoke about the dynamics of rating voting with posters on the lawns. “I couldn’t afford to alienate the supporters of my opponents,” she said, “because the voters who chose the second and third options were crucial in determining who would win. I couldn’t take a single vote for granted or write off any voter.” Later that morning, in testimony before a State Senate committee, Peltola made a startling remark about non-partisan primaries. “I wouldn’t have gotten through the primary,” she said, “because I’m not liberal enough.” She complained that in the partisan primaries “we go further to the right and further to the left.”